It is easy to whine, gripe, attack and predict disaster is at the doorstep. Having the courage to solve real problems is hard and sometimes costly. After all, there is always someone or some group ready, willing and able to do what's easy.
Governor Martin O'Malley and the Democratic leaders of the General Assembly had the courage to build a strong fiscal wall against the $1.7 billion structural deficit they inherited. They built that wall in the open; publicly announcing solutions and the reasons for them in a series of news conferences held across the state. Then, they made difficult decisions in a widely reported, praised and criticized Special Session.
Had that structural deficit been solved by the previous governor, no Special Session would have been required. But Bob Ehrlich, with his record-breaking tax hikes, financial band-aides, borrowing and boisterous pronouncements of fiscal efficiency, failed to solve a problem he inherited only to make it worse.
Do you recall in 2002 how Ehrlich loudly denounced the $4 billion deficit he would solve? That figure was largely structural - spread out over the years to come. It existed in 2002 and it got bigger under Ehrlich by 2006.
Forget the so-called "surplus" left by Ehrlich. There wasn't one. The extra cash on hand that balanced last year's budget was already spent - set aside in a "special purposes account" - by Ehrlich. The "special purpose" was to balance the General Fund Budget in 2007. On that issue, there can be no dispute. I have the audio recordings.
The raging waters of inflation, progress or just plain need may attempt to slop future budgets over that new "fiscal wall" in the years ahead. But Democrats have shown they can cut budgets, too. Since 2006, Democrats imposed cuts of over $1.8 billion on budgets past, present and future.
So in response, where do we find the once united Annapolis Republicans who screamed in defiance at all of it? In the end, their House leadership got caught proposing an alternative budget that actually spent 85 percent of the Special Session revenue they had voted against. Half of the Republican Senators - and a few Republican Delegates - voted to approve the state budget based in part on that revenue. Of course, the other Republicans didn't.
So, despite their small size, they split and splintered. In the end they couldn't even agree with each other on the Smith Island Cake. Some belittled our new "state cake" as a complete waste of time for a General Assembly facing serious issues. They must have forgotten it was a Republican sponsored bill in the first place.
Building that fiscal wall in full public view took courage. Making those cuts took courage. Still, all those difficult decisions renewed the unity and direction of the Democratic leaders in Annapolis. They have ensured progress on mutltiple fronts for all Marylanders. Education, clean air, clean water, a cleaner Chesapeake Bay, health care, energy conservation, public safety, transportation and more have all been improved and advanced by courageous Democrats in tough times.
Democrats even made sure one Republican had a victory for an odd little bill with a good purpose behind it. The isolated residents of historic Smith Island - dependent on the fruits of a struggling seafood industry - got a much needed boost in tourism and cake commerce and therefore, economic survival.
Political courage not only unites, it attracts converts by doing what's right when everyone is watching. Who knew some Republicans would come around and work cooperatively where they can. Of course there are those who haven't, yet.
Who was the last governor who had served less than two years when he was tapped for the vice presidential nomination? >
To view more cartoons by Politicker.com editorial cartoonist Rob Tornoe, click here. >
OK, time for your ol’ Uncle Kenny to take everyone to the woodshed. It is time for everyone to grow up and get over it. Be prepared, no one will ... >
Friends and neighbors, colleagues and activists – people I know who know what I do - want to know the answer before it happens. My life-long ... >
politics
Politics is the process by which groups of people make decisions. The term is generally applied to behavior within civil governments, but politics has been observed in all human group interactions, including corporate, academic, and religious institutions.
Fooooo
Just a couple of things.
The General Assembly did cut Ehrlich's budgets. Every year. They had to. His fiscal discipline was so poor they had to bring every Ehrlich budget under spending affordability guidelines. He couldn't do that job for some odd reason, meaning Ehrlich never had a single "cut" in government - according to your description. Not one.
Ehrlich spent millions of tax dollars on TV ads in which he featured himself as the star - not Maryland or a Maryland program. The General Assembly stopped such practices within a certain time period before an election. It's odd such a fiscal conservative as yourself would find such a practice by Ehrlich acceptable.
Having a "Capital for a Day" is not a bad thing unless you run them in an election year like campaign rallies - complete with an arena announcer shouting the cabinet secretaries, the Gov and Lt. Gov. to the "stage" like a pro-wrestling match. Bring in the campaign t-shirts and campaign signs for the campaign volunteers to flash while cheering. How much state business did they get done in that arena on your dime?
I would have thought that such an informed "citizen" as yourself would recall that slots are part of the fiscal fix passed during the Special Session. Ehrlich got caught trying to lobby against it. Didn't he claim to support them for the state's fiscal health? Now he says they're not good? Or, did he want them just for himself? Anyway, this Governor got a bill through in the face of the same opposition where Ehrlich failed.
That's called building consensus and leadership. Ehrlich should have tried using it a little.
Square off? You need to get your facts straight first before that would be a fair fight.
Let's see if I got this
Let's see if I got this right. David Paulson says that Ehrlich was evil: big taxer, big spender, etc. He then tells us that Republicans are hypocrites for failing to vote against O'Malley's budget.
Help me out here David. Was the legislature dominated by Republicans from 2002-2006? Did they even have enough Senators to filabuster? And if they didn't, then wouldn't your Democratic pals in the legislature be equally responsible for 'evils' you see in the Ehrlich budget?
Especially since the legislature can ONLY CUT and not add to the budget? Wait, but you said they cut $1.8 billion in the last 2 years...is that cutting from proposed new spending? If so, why don't they propose a $1 trillion dollar budget they so they can cut $960 billion! Wouldn't that be grand?
Does anyone recall David Paulson whining about Ehrlich showing up in promotional materials for tourism? There weren't legislators calling for a ban on such practices were there? And then yesterday we read in the Washington Post that Martin O'Malley is doing radio ads with his voice, billboards and bus ads with his dreamy photo, and mailers?
Sorry David, we're not done. Paulson also criticized Ehrlich's 'capital for a day'. Yah, all 3 capitals that Ehrlich toured in 4 years. By the end of this year O'Malley will have created 14 capitals for a day is it? Paulson's miracously silent on this one.
Of course there is that little structural deficit problem. You know, the whole reason we had special session. The reason O'Malley passed the largest tax hike in Maryland history. Right, and it went so well that now we MUST have slots otherwise we'll have a new structural deficit? Gosh, it sure sounds like O'Malley "fixed" the problem.
And those raging waters of inflation...are they anything like the cool crystal clear waters of civil discontent (everyone does remember O'Malley's lyrical prose in his Special Session speech)?
Let's here it for our courageous leaders who made tough decisions says Paulson!! Ummmm, isn't that what George W. Bush said? He had to make tough decisions, even if they were unpopular. O'Malley - is - Bush?
David, can we do a faceoff? You must have something better than this dribble otherwise Peter Franchot is the next nominee for the Democrats, hands down.
Issues Matter
And Bob Ehrlich had issues. There is nothing wrong with discussing issues.
At least no one takes issue (so far) with the facts as written about Mr. Ehrlich's record as described.
Someone should tell the Republicans that governance is more than whining on talk radio about their lot in life.
They might be welcomed on the air with open arms and not have their "message" interrupted, but they won't accomplish much either.
Just because Republicans have a convenient group memory that allows them to claim they're still against more revenues doesn't mean everyone need oblige and not mention the budget they submitted that spends the money or, the votes they cast that memorializes it all in stone.
Come to think of it, no one has denied that either. Good thing, too. Facts are facts.
Some Republicans do have courage. Some just want to work well with others. And some just got caught trying to be sneaky. On that there seems to be agreement or at least, a desire to avoid the topic.
But, denials can be messy. You run the risk of the facts getting in the way. It's just easier to hurl some insults and get back to the "whine, gripe, attack and predict disaster..." part of the act.
All this guy and his
All this guy and his partisan friends did was attack Ehrlich for four years.
Spending a million dollars on a witchhunt into Ehrlich's personnel policies? Smearing dozens of people? Nonstop attacks from the Maryland Democrat Party?
Political courage, Mr. Paulson?
And another thing--you guys have run the state almos nonstop for 40 years. These "structural problems" are your doing.
This is a touch more accurate...
http://redmaryland.blogspot.com/2008/05/bologna-boy-still-full-of-bologn...
Finally
I'm glad we finally have a governor who can actually work with the legislature again.
Yes they did. Unlike ehrlich
Yes they did. Unlike ehrlich who did exactly as you say, this governor submitted budgets that actually met spending affordability guidlines.
Ehrlich failed for four years in a row, and THEN claimed to be a budget cutter.
Not "cuts"
Since 2006, Democrats imposed cuts of over $1.8 billion on budgets past, present and future.
No they didn't. If there were actual cuts, why does the state spend more money now than it did in 2006? They didn't increase spending quite as much as they wanted to; this is not the same thing as a cut.
Post new comment