State Sen. Andy Harris (R-Cockeysville) announced his energy plan during a speech before the Salisbury Chamber of Commerce this afternoon. The GOP nominee in Maryland's 1st Congressional District, Harris, a physician, called his proposal a "prescription for the pain at the pump," pledging to "take the lead in fighting against these out of control gas prices."
"Working families should not be forced to decide whether to fill up the gas tank or put food on their table," Harris said.
A five-point plan, Harris reiterates earlier campaign pledges in his proposal, including a call to suspend the gas tax from Memorial Day, which has passed, through Labor Day.
State's Attorney Frank Kratovil (D-Stevensville), Harris' opponent, has rejected the idea of a gas tax holiday, calling it a "ploy" and a "short-term answer" in a recent radio interview, while saying it "does little good."
Harris' support for drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) is a position that U.S. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, rejected after announcing his support for offshore oil drilling earlier this week.
"We'll have to agree to disagree," Harris Campaign Manager Chris Meekins told PolitickerMD.com in regards to McCain's position on ANWR.
"Andy feels it is in the best interest of the people of the first district to explore," Meekins added.
Kratovil has also spoken out against drilling in ANWR, citing environmental concerns.
"The reality of ANWR is the benefits do not outweigh the costs," Erik Gulbrandsen, Kratovil's communications director, told PolitickerMD.com yesterday.
The Harris proposal, as provided by the campaign, is as follows:
1. Temporarily suspend the federal and state gasoline taxes of $.42 from Memorial Day through Labor Day.
2. Increase efficiency and simplify the refining process by temporarily reducing the over 40 different gasoline blends nationwide to four blends.
3. Open domestic natural gas and oil production in areas such as off the Aleutian Islands, in ANWR, and on the continental shelf to decrease our dependence on oil from foreign countries.
4. Increase long-term oil-refining capacity by establishing fast-track approval for construction of new refineries and expansion of existing refineries.
5. Provide incentives for technological innovations in alternative forms of energy like nuclear, cellulosic ethanol, solar, geothermal, and hydrogen cell.
Notice the byline on the Associated Press story announcing Mitt Romney will be speaking in Denver during the DNC Convention? >
To view more cartoons by Politicker.com editorial cartoonist Rob Tornoe, click here. >
Watching the performance of Sen. Barack Obama during the Saddleback Showdown on CNN this past weekend was almost like watching Dancing With The ... >
Friends and neighbors, colleagues and activists – people I know who know what I do - want to know the answer before it happens. My life-long ... >
Of course when Illinois
Of course when Illinois tried it they pocketed the money...that's because they are about as corrupt as they come (and we're about to elect a Pres. from there...) If it is done responsibly, then it would certainly be a good idea.
Also, regarding your statement about the price of gas, it is determined by each company. Yet a large portion of that cost is tax. If you were to remove the tax, then companies would lower. All it would take would be one company to drop their prices and the rest would follow. That's how it works in a capitalist economy, not the socialist haven which I'm sure you dream about.
Just another pander to big business
What a goober. If prices at the pump are impacted by the gas tax, then why isn't the price at T's corner 8 cents less than the price in just north at the Dixieland? Unlike the difference between the prices on the Eastern and Western shore the difference cannot be accounted for by economic geography; rather, it is because the oil companies determine the price. When Illinois tried this, the oil companies lowered the price a few cents and pocketed the differene. The state lost transporataion funds nad the consumer got the shaft. Then when the holiday was over, the oil companies raised the price by the full differene of the tax. This is why the Democratic nominee, who supported the plan in IL, said it won't work. He learned from experience. Gas Tax holidays are a sham and anyone proposing one is just pandering.
As far as drilling goes, lack of crude is not what is driving up the price, so even if you discount the fact that it takes 5 to 10 years to see the first drop of crude, new drilling ANYWHERE will have virtually no effect on the price at the pump. If it were the Saudis would increase production. The problem is two-fold: deregulation of energy commodities that create opportunity for speculators and in the hands of the oil companies drive up the price of crude; and second, the downward value of the dollar.
Post new comment